User talk:M412k

Government Warehouse

In Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Government Warehouse you said that the original contents of Government Warehouse, before my later rewrite, were "not suitable for a Wikipedia article". Reddi (talk · contribs) has since restored those original unverifiable contents to the article, and then, when I removed them again, "in order to avoid an edit war" forked List of the Government Warehouse's contents. That latter has since been nominated for deletion, but currently there is just the one keep vote. Reddi (talk · contribs) has stated on Talk:Government Warehouse that if the latter article is deleted, xe intends to re-add the content to Government Warehouse once again. Please contribute to the discussions at Talk:Government Warehouse and Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of the Government Warehouse's contents. Uncle G 13:20:33, 2005-08-10 (UTC)

greetings

I'm new here so I thought I'd introduce myself to some of the people here--Chapline R Vine^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 21:47, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

URGENT! Your vote needed

Come vote here please to decide this important matter! i trust that you'll make the right decision--Rictonilpog 17:24, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Troy J. Rose

Just to let you know I reverted the article back to its non-copyright version. All three lines of it. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, M412k! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. ⁪froth^{T C} 07:01, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Beary AFD Vote

The article on Orange County, Florida Sheriff Kevin Beary which you have previously edited has been nominated for deletion. Please feel free to share your thoughts on this matter. --TommyBoy 03:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Killik

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Killik, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:12, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject University of Central Florida

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Central Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the University of Central Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thank you and Go Knights!

--Scpmarlins (talk) 18:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion for Press-up

Happy New Year! As a user who has previously stated support for moving Press-up to "Push-up", I invite you to weigh in on the move discussion currently under way: Talk:Press-up#Requested_move_2. Clconway (talk) 23:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]