Jump to content

Talk:Joseph Ellis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Needs expansion

[edit]

With its focus on controversies, this is like a People magazine article. Ellis has had a long and respected career of solid history writing. That needs more attention.--Parkwells (talk) 15:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Long? yes. Respected, NO! not a chance. Passionate sage, american sphinxand founding brothers for starters should be reclassified as historical fiction because much of what ellis tells the reader is make believe. His books are worse than tabloid because he wraps them in the respect that most people ( many times wrongly) attribute to respected colleges.

what a hoax on the reader and the truth. What is disappointments is that those professors who could have spoken up did not they just kept quiet. Notice that no scholars gie peer reviews on ellis that is because they would put themselves in his catagory. What Winkipedia needs to do ( if they are actually on the level and not in the pocket of the publishers is to start a running list of historians who lie and allow others to really tell the truth about these fictional history books) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.72.27.233 (talk) 09:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would take these criticisms a little more seriously if they came from someone with basic writing and grammatical skills.

2601:643:8104:730:3D21:7D57:C2A2:E4D8 (talk) 08:08, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, someone has to be an expert in grammar to make a valid point in your opinion? As wiki is home to much spurious information and poor grammar, one wonders why you're even here.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Joseph Ellis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph Ellis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joseph Ellis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_Ellis&oldid=1201731112"